Week Three: Casta Paintings and Catalina de Erauso

Catalina de Erauso is really a story of more than just gender, but she is also a story of the New World following the influx of conquistadores. Her ability to perform a variety of jobs such as lieutenant, merchant, and farmer reveal the pure amount of opportunity for Spanish men within the New World. As we have discussed many made the journey in hopes of becoming elite or wealthy as the social stratification within the New World was at its beginning phase. It seems as though there was a sort of desperation to create these old systems of order within new environments as the Casta paintings suggest. The detailed nature of the Casta paintings reflect a kind of desperation to have hierarchy as people are divided and subdivided into as many categories as possible. Of course these paintings favor the conquerer as the superior race yet I found it interesting how the indigenous woman was positioned higher in society than the African woman. It speaks to the intensity of anti-black racism but the argumentation that the natives were "natural slaves" seems like it could've complicated this narrative. In the end it didn't matter to the Spanish who was placed where in the hierarchy because they were always at the top.

I wasn't totally sure how to feel about Catalina de Erauso. On one hand she represents the sort of destruction of gender construction as she is able to not only live independently but be rather successful in each profession she undertakes. Yet at the same time she is extremely violent, not only to the natives but anyone who crosses her. In this sense I don't find her a particularly inspiring or cunning leader as she seems to be largely reactive. I was shocked by the fact that she killed her brother and still throughout the entire endeavor never revealed that she was his sister. I did really wonder how her story could stop so abruptly in Mexico. Do they know where her remains are? Did she marry? Did she live out the rest of her life as a man?

The story of Catalina makes me, if anything, want more stories of female figures within the New World. Recently I have been reading about Malinche, the translator and eventual spouse of Cortes. The different ways that women were able to engage in conquest seem pertinent yet not much studied.

Comments

  1. JonSeptember 16, 2019 at 12:50 AM

    "The different ways that women were able to engage in conquest seem pertinent yet not much studied."

    I think this is a good point, and that it's also a good point to say that Catalina de Erauso's story is in some ways a bit troubling. Yes, she personally may have liberated herself from one set of gender constraints... but she hardly struck a blow against current conceptions of masculinity, did she?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 13: Towards and Uncertain Future

For this week, I decided to write about Chile. Chile is in the middle of a decisive moment as students went to the streets to protest against a rise in metro costs. The unrest is surprising as Chile lauds itself for being one of the most prosperous countries in Latin America. For my articles this week, I picked two opinion peaces that look into the nuances of the situation. The first piece, by the New York Times, titled Chile Learns the Price of Economic Inequality, examines the protests in the context of economic prosperity. While the Chilean economy is quite strong, the economic inequality means that only a few benefit from the wealth. Public spending on hospitals, public welfare, and more general methods of distributing wealth are virtually nonexistent. The article also points out that while the protesters began their movement after the rise in bus fare, tensions have existed for a long time due to this evident wealth inequality. The wealth gap in Chile is incredibly visual; San
Read more

Week 12: Speaking Truth To Power

This week's reading was incredibly powerful to read. I have learned about the Madre's before; their white bonnets seem to have become a symbol of resistance. The concept of the disappeared within Latin American politics is an interesting positionality. In the eyes of the state, individuals are reduced to bodies where no rights are guaranteed. Its such a devastating position as there is no sense of justice; the feeling is alien to me as I have always lived somewhere with a certain extent of due process. The Madres were successful because of their position as older women; the government could not kill mothers and grandmothers in the public sphere without large reproductions. This could be attributed to significant gender roles. As women were seen as fragile, homemakers, and child-bearers, there was an element of weakness associated with their murder. However, I believe this was true for the Madres because they had already gained global attention. The Argentinian government had no
Read more

Week 7: Porfirio Díaz

I think this primary source was the most interesting yet for me to read. Having always thought of Díaz as a violent dictator, it was really fascinating to see an American account of how he was the democratic ideal. There were a few spots in the article that I found particularly compelling. The first was how Díaz referred to an opposing political party as "enemies." It seemed so obvious to me at this moment that he was incredibly disingenuous about his political processes. Democratic discourse is not a question of enemies but rather fair opposition. In light of the fact that he rigged the election against Madero in 1910. The second was the American sentiment that saturated the piece. As an American myself, there is often this sort of trope of someone who starts from nowhere and then picks himself up and becomes wealthy. I think the idea that Díaz came from little and was able to become the father of modernization in Mexico was particularly consumable to an American audience.
Read more